(1) QUT is committed to maintaining high academic and professional standards and expects students to undertake academic work and assessment in a manner which is fair, honest and accountable. This Policy: (2) While the core concepts of academic integrity apply to all students undertaking any form of academic work, this Policy applies to students undertaking undergraduate or postgraduate coursework studies. (3) For research higher degree students, integrity matters are addressed in the QUT Code for Responsible Conduct of Research and in the Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the QUT Code for Responsible Conduct of Research Policy. (4) Courses at QUT promote ethical behaviour, including honesty, fairness, accountability and the adherence to appropriate codes of practice relevant to a discipline or professional area (Graduate Capabilities Policy). (5) Academic integrity means adopting an approach to academic work and assessment that upholds these ethical principles. Adopting this approach enables students to develop professional capabilities that are based on strong ethical foundations. (6) QUT assists students to understand how to approach their academic work and assessment in a way that upholds appropriate standards of academic integrity by: (7) The following actions or practices by a student constitute a failure to maintain appropriate standards of academic integrity and may be dealt with as academic misconduct: (8) The University may impose penalties for substantiated major academic misconduct (Management of Student Misconduct Policy). A finding of academic misconduct may also have significant implications in professional contexts following graduation. (9) Academic misconduct includes: (10) Teaching staff will normally identify suspected academic misconduct. If a member of the teaching staff suspects that a student may have failed to uphold appropriate standards of academic integrity, the Unit Coordinator must be notified. Relevant considerations for identification of academic misconduct are as follows. (11) In considering a suspected failure to uphold appropriate standards of academic integrity, it must be determined whether the case represents a possible case of minor or major academic misconduct. (12) The following considerations can be used to assist in assessing whether a case should be considered minor or major: (13) Minor cases of academic misconduct are dealt with in accordance with the Management of Student Misconduct Policy. Minor cases include: (14) Where it is determined that minor academic misconduct has occurred no penalty is applied and the assessment item is graded according to the assessment criteria. (15) Deduction of marks or reduction of grade/s must be justified against the assessment criteria or marking guide for the assessment item. (16) Where not characterised as minor academic misconduct, allegations of academic misconduct are dealt with as major cases in accordance with Management of Student Misconduct Policy. If a major case of academic misconduct is substantiated, the Executive Dean or Vice-President (Administration) and University Registrar may impose the penalties set out in Management of Student Misconduct Policy, Penalaties. (17) To assist in identifying potential academic misconduct, students can be required to use content matching or authenticity software as part of the preparation or submission of assessment tasks. (18) If a Unit Coordinator has reasonable concerns that a student’s actions could be dealt with as a case of major academic misconduct, the Unit Coordinator may require the student to authenticate their learning. (19) The authentication process must provide the student with an opportunity to demonstrate their competence or knowledge in the subject matter of the assessment item in question, in a manner that is appropriate to the nature of the assessment item. (20) This might include (but is not limited to) the Unit Coordinator: (21) The following conditions apply to the authentication of learning process: (22) The Unit Coordinator will consider the outcome of the authentication of learning process in determining whether to deal with the matter as a case of major academic misconduct under the Management of Student Misconduct Policy. (23) If authentication of learning has not previously been undertaken or attempted, a Faculty Academic Misconduct Committee may refer a case back to a Unit Coordinator to conduct an authentication of learning process, provided that no findings have yet been made on the allegations by the Committee. (24) Consistent with recordkeeping and reporting in the Management of Student Misconduct Policy, records must be maintained for minor and major cases of academic misconduct. An annual report on academic misconduct is prepared and presented to University Academic Board. (25) Appeals Committee reports to University Academic Board and Council annually, including on appeals for academic misconduct cases. (26) Refer to Register of Authorities and Delegations (C132) (QUT staff access only).Academic Integrity Policy
Section 1 - Purpose
Top of PageSection 2 - Application
Section 3 - Roles and Responsibilities
Top of Page
Position
Responsibility
Vice-President (Administration) and University Registrar
Monitors the effectiveness of academic integrity practices and systems, and is alert to new forms of academic misconduct.
Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Provides training and support for academic staff to design curriculum and assessment that assists students to build their capacity in ethical scholarly and professional practice.
Utilises institutional academic misconduct data to improve practices in teaching and learning.
Oversees the development and administration of academic integrity resources, training and support for students.
Provides training, learning design support and technology-enabled systems for academic and professional staff to design and implement, and conduct student assessment with integrity.
Provides online resources on academic integrity.
Vice-President (Digital) and Chief Digital Officer
Ensures the provision of academic-integrity related software as required by Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic).
Executive Dean
Promotes a culture of personal and shared responsibility for academic and professional integrity, for all staff and students.
Promotes academic integrity training and support for academic staff, in their learning and teaching roles.
Utilises faculty academic misconduct data to improve practices in teaching and learning, in consultation with the Head of School.
Chair, Faculty Academic Misconduct Committee
Provides advice and assistance to relevant faculty staff on academic integrity matters and the appropriate management of academic misconduct.
Unit Coordinator
(or equivalent)Designs learning and assessment practices that embody appropriate standards of academic and professional integrity.
Designs and conducts authentication of learning processes.
Determines whether a matter should be managed as minor or major academic misconduct in consultation with the course coordinator (or equivalent) and the relevant Faculty Academic Misconduct Committee.
Examinations Coordinator
Determines whether an allegation relating to a central examination should be managed as minor or major academic misconduct.
Teaching staff (including markers)
Identifies possible academic misconduct.
Student
Adopts an ethical approach to academic work and assessment in accordance with this Policy and the Code of Conduct - Student.
Section 4 - Academic Integrity and Professional Capabilities
Section 5 - Supporting Students to Conduct Academic Work and Assessment with Integrity
Top of PageSection 6 - Academic Misconduct
Top of Page
Section 7 - Identifying Academic Misconduct
Determining Nature of Academic Misconduct
Minor Academic Misconduct
Major Academic Misconduct
Content Matching and Authenticity Tools
Authentication of Learning
Section 8 - Recordkeeping and Reporting
Section 9 - Delegations
View Document
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.