(1) This Policy outlines the procedures to be used in cases where an allegation(s) of misconduct/serious misconduct is made against a senior staff member. (2) The Policy aims to provide a fair and just process by which an allegation(s) of misconduct/serious misconduct may be investigated and determined by the Vice-Chancellor and President. (3) This Policy, and the associated procedures, applies to senior staff members employed on an ongoing or fixed-term appointment at classification levels SSGA to SSGE inclusive. It excludes those senior staff on probation and those employed on a casual basis. (4) Before the Vice-Chancellor and President takes disciplinary action against a staff member for conduct amounting to misconduct or serious misconduct, the Vice-Chancellor and President must take the steps in this Policy except that, where a matter which may involve misconduct or serious misconduct has been dealt with in good faith as if it were a case of unsatisfactory performance under the Managing Unsatisfactory Performance Policy - Senior Staff, the procedures in this Policy are not required. (5) The principles which underlie this Policy are as follows: (6) Despite any reference to the Vice-Chancellor and President throughout this Policy, the Vice-Chancellor and President may, at any time, delegate their roles or obligations under this Policy to another senior officer of the University. The Vice-Chancellor and President may not delegate their role to a senior officer who is directly involved in the matter which is the subject of the procedures governed by this Policy, or to a senior officer who the Vice-Chancellor and President intends to nominate as a member of a committee established under these procedures. (7) There are four key phases in the procedures for managing allegations of misconduct/serious misconduct and the determination of disciplinary action: (8) There are exit points from the procedures at the end of Phase 2, or the matter may continue to Phase 3, investigation by the Misconduct Investigation Committee. (9) The procedures provide the Vice-Chancellor and President with the authority to determine whether or not misconduct/serious misconduct has occurred, whether or not to impose disciplinary action and, if so, what that action will be. (10) Under the procedures, where the allegation(s) is wholly or partly denied by the staff member, or where the staff member has not responded to the allegation(s), the Vice-Chancellor and President may refer the matter to the Misconduct Investigation Committee for investigation and provision of a report to the Vice-Chancellor and President. Where referral of the matter to the Misconduct Investigation Committee occurs, final determination of the matter remains with the Vice-Chancellor and President. (11) Any allegation of misconduct or serious misconduct will be considered by the Vice-Chancellor and President. If they believe such allegation(s) warrant further investigation, the Vice-Chancellor and President will: (12) At the time of notifying the staff member in accordance with section (a) above, if the Vice-Chancellor and President is of the view that the alleged conduct is such that it would be unreasonable to require the University to continue the staff member's attendance at work pending investigation of the allegation(s) in accordance with the procedures outlined in this Policy, they may suspend the staff member with or without pay. (13) However, where suspension without pay occurs: (14) During any period of suspension, the staff member may be excluded from the University. An exception to this is that the staff member will be permitted reasonable access to the University for the preparation of their case and to collect personal property. (15) If each of the allegation(s) made against the staff member is denied by the staff member, and the Vice-Chancellor and President is of the view that there has been no misconduct or serious misconduct, they will immediately advise the staff member in writing and may, at the request of the staff member, publish the advice in an appropriate manner. (16) If one or more of the allegation(s) are admitted by the staff member and the Vice-Chancellor and President is of the view that the conduct constitutes misconduct or serious misconduct, the Vice-Chancellor and President will advise the staff member in writing of the decision and the operative date and details of the disciplinary action to be taken. (17) If each of the allegation(s) is wholly or partly denied, or if the staff member has not responded to the allegation(s), the Vice-Chancellor and President may: (18) Where a matter is referred to the Misconduct Investigation Committee for investigation: (19) The Misconduct Investigation Committee shall conduct its proceedings consistent with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness and shall: (20) The Misconduct Investigation Committee will provide the Vice-Chancellor and President with a written report containing a finding. The Committee's report will indicate whether any mitigating circumstances are evident and, whether or not, in the Committee's view, the allegation(s) have been established on the balance of probabilities. (Where the view of the Committee is not unanimous, the minority view holder shall include in the report to the Vice-Chancellor and President the reasons for their view). (21) Following consideration of the report from the Misconduct Investigation Committee (which will not be binding on the Vice-Chancellor and President), the Vice-Chancellor and President shall determine whether or not misconduct or serious misconduct has occurred.Disciplinary Action for Misconduct and Serious Misconduct Policy - Senior Staff
Section 1 - Purpose
Section 2 - Application
Section 3 - Definitions
Term
Definition
Disciplinary Action
Means action by the University to discipline a staff member and may include:
Misconduct
Means conduct that is unsatisfactory but which is not so serious as to justify the possibility of termination of employment.
Misconduct Investigation Committee
Is the Committee established by the Vice-Chancellor and President to investigate allegation(s) of misconduct and serious misconduct. The Misconduct Investigation Committee will comprise:
Representative
Means:
Serious Misconduct
Is misconduct of a serious and wilful nature and is usually conduct of a type that would make it unreasonable to require the University to continue employment of the staff member concerned (Section CM (1)(c) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996).
Conduct which may constitute serious misconduct includes, but is not limited to, such things as:
Top of PageSection 4 - Principles
Top of PageSection 5 - Delegation of Process Issues
Section 6 - Procedures/Key phases
Section 7 - Phase 1: Consideration of Allegation(s) by Vice-Chancellor and President and Notification of Staff Member
Section 8 - Phase 2: Action by Vice-Chancellor and President
Top of Page
Section 9 - Phase 3: Investigation by Misconduct Investigation Committee
Section 10 - Phase 4: Determination by Vice-Chancellor and President
View Document
This is the current version of this document. You can provide feedback on this document to the document author - refer to the Status and Details on the document's navigation bar.
In either case above, excludes a person who is currently practising as a solicitor or barrister.